🔗 Share this article

The true crime genre has a new medium, or perhaps even a whole new language and grammar: police body cam footage. Countenances of those harmed, witnesses and possible perpetrators appear suddenly to the cameras, at times in the harsh glare of vehicle beams or torches as the officers approach, their expressions and tones eloquent of caution or fear or anger or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we frequently catch sight of the expressions of the law enforcement personnel, one standing by blankly while the other asks the questions with what occasionally seems like remarkable hesitation – though perhaps this is because they are aware they are being recorded.

A Growing Trend in Documentary Filmmaking

We have already had the streaming service real-life crime film American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the slaying of an Instagram influencer by her partner, whose primary focus was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed extraordinarily lax with the perpetrator. There is also the acclaimed short film Incident by Bill Morrison, composed entirely of officer footage. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the grim case of a Florida mother in Ocala, Florida, a woman of colour whose children allegedly harassed and tormented her white neighbour, a local resident. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the authorities were summoned multiple times, Lorincz shot Owens dead through her closed front door, when Owens went to the neighbor's residence to address her about hurling items at her children.

The Investigation and Legal Context

The arresting officers found evidence that Lorincz had done internet searches into the state's self-defense statutes, which allow residents and others to shoot if there is a reasonable belief of threat. The movie constructs its narrative with the body cam footage captured during the multiple officer calls to the location before the killing, and then at the disturbing and disordered crime scene itself – introduced by emergency call recordings of Lorincz calling the police in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also police cell footage of Lorincz which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Portrayal of the Accused

The documentary does not really suggest anything too complex about Lorincz, or any extenuating circumstance. She is obviously disturbed, although the children are heard calling her “the Karen”, an ugly jibe. The production is presented as an example of how “stand your ground” laws lead to unnecessary and heartbreaking violence. But the reality of firearm possession and the constitutional right (that historic American constitutional privilege that a late commentator famously claimed made firearm fatalities a necessary cost) is not much highlighted.

Police Interrogation and Gun Culture

It is feasible to watch the officer questioning segments here and feel surprised at how little interest the officers took in this aspect. When did she buy her gun? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? Where did she store it in the house? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they may have done in footage that were not included). Or is possessing a firearm so normal it would be like asking about kitchen appliances or toasters?

Detention and Consequences

For what seemed to her local residents a very long time, the suspect was not even arrested and charged, only held and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another point of comparison, incidentally, with the a prior incident). And when she was ultimately officially taken into custody in the detention area, there is an remarkable scene in which Lorincz simply refuses to stand, refuses to put her wrists out for the handcuffs, not aggressively, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose mental health means that she just can’t do it. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point led her to think that this might actually work?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It was not successful; and the jury’s verdict is saved for the closing credits. A very sombre picture of U.S. justice and consequences.