🔗 Share this article

Based on a recent examination, dozens of personnel with backgrounds in the energy field have been appointed within the current government, comprising over 40 who earlier served directly for coal corporations.

Overview of the Study

The analysis analyzed the profiles of nominees and appointees serving in the White House and eight national offices handling climate policy. These encompass important organizations including the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior, and the Department of Energy.

Broader Regulatory Climate

This review emerges during continuing initiatives to dismantle energy rules and renewable energy programs. As an example, new legislation have unlocked extensive areas of public property for drilling and eliminated backing for sustainable sources.

Amid the firehose of negative things that have transpired on the ecological arena... it’s important to remind the citizens that these aren’t just steps from the nebulous, massive thing that is the administration writ large, said a analyst engaged in the analysis. It is frequently particular actors coming from certain wealthy groups that are executing this disastrous anti-regulatory plan.

Significant Results

Researchers discovered 111 employees whom they classified as industry insiders and alternative energy adversaries. This covers 43 people who were previously employed by gas companies. Included in them are prominent leading officials including the energy secretary, who earlier acted as CEO of a fracking company.

The roster also includes less prominent White House personnel. For instance, the office handling renewable energy is headed by a former oil executive. In the same vein, a senior policy advisor in the White House has occupied senior positions at major energy companies.

Further Connections

A further 12 appointees possess connections to energy-financed libertarian thinktanks. These include former staff and associates of entities that have vigorously fought clean power and championed the expansion of conventional sources.

Additionally 29 additional appointees are previous industry leaders from polluting industries whose business interests are directly tied to oil and gas. Further officials have connections with energy companies that market traditional energy or public officials who have pushed pro-coal policies.

Departmental Emphasis

Investigators identified that 32 employees at the interior agency alone have ties to extractive industries, rendering it the most compromised national body. That encompasses the leader of the agency, who has repeatedly received oil funding and functioned as a link between energy business contributors and the administration.

Political Funding

Oil and gas donors contributed sizable resources to the presidential effort and ceremony. Since entering the White House, the administration has not only established pro-fossil fuel policies but also designed tax breaks and exceptions that benefit the sector.

Expertise Issues

Besides energy-connected appointees, the analysts identified multiple White House leaders who were selected to influential roles with little or no relevant expertise.

Those officials may not be linked to oil and gas so closely, but their inexperience is problematic, said a analyst. It is plausible to think they will be compliant, or easy marks, for the energy sector’s objectives.

As an example, the nominee to lead the EPA’s department of chief legal officer has limited legal history, having not ever argued a legal matter to verdict, nor taken a deposition, and not filed a legal request.

During another instance, a executive assistant working on energy matters came to the job after serving in positions unrelated to energy, with no obvious specific field or administrative experience.

White House Reaction

One representative for the executive branch criticized the findings, commenting that the administration’s officials are extremely competent to execute on the voters’ instruction to increase domestic energy development.

Historical and Current Environment

This administration enacted a massive series of pro-industry measures during its initial term. In its current tenure, backed with rightwing agendas, it has spearheaded a much wider and harsher rollback on environmental policies and alternative sources.

There’s no embarrassment, said a analyst. The administration is proud and willing to go out there and tout the fact that they are doing favors for the fossil fuel business, resource sector, the mining industry.